Year: 1952
Director: Roy Ward Baker
Cast: Marilyn Monroe, Richard Widmark, Anne Bancroft, Elisha Cook Jr.
Much like The Set-Up, a movie from 3 years earlier, Don’t Bother to Knock attempts to tell a story in real time or at least near real time. This is a stylistic choice that was rarely made in films of this era, in fact it has rarely been attempted in the entire history of film. A few examples come to mind, such as the television show 24, starring Kiefer Sutherland, and the 2003 film Phone Booth as well as 88 minutes with Al Pacino. Rope (1948), which was Directed by Alfred Hitchcock also employed an attempt at this near real time approach.
Much like Rope, Don’t Bother to Knock begins to feel somewhat claustrophobic. The fact that it all takes place in the same location, a hotel in New York, also adds to the claustrophobic feel. These choices serve the story, for Marilyn Monroe’s character is not entirely stable, in fact, she has spent some time in a mental institution. Those three years in the institution supposedly did a lot of good for her, but the one night she spends in this hotel might do just as much bad for her. It is as if her isolation in one location unravels the positive results of her isolation in another location.
Besides the ambitious efforts to tell this story in real time and in one location, the other most impressive aspect of this film has got to be Marilyn Monroe and her performance. Here we see her in the first few years of her film career, with a whole decade of film roles ahead of her, and already we can see that she is more than just a pretty face and a set of seductive curves, but an impressive actor as well. She is an actress who much like other early well known method actors, such as Marlon Brando and Rod Steiger, used method acting to great success. Don’t Bother to Knock is arguably one of her greatest successes as an actress, and ironically came fairly early in her career, much before a lot of criticism arose. After watching a movie like Don’t Bother to Knock, it is ironic that her talents were often questioned by critics of the time and the present. Her performance is clearly the best thing this film has going for it.
The story is about a young woman, who is haunted by a melancholy and apparently sadly repressive past. Part of what is engaging about this film is trying to not only figure out exactly what in her past might have caused her mental and emotional damage, but also whether or not the supposed clues to that past point in the direction one might assume when watching the film. Viewing Don’t Bother to Knock certainly leads one to want to read the source material, a novel by Charlotte Armstrong entitled Mischief. A movie such as Don’t Bother to Knock must have pushed the censorship guidelines of the time for film. Surely, the source material must contain some juicy details that would fill out the story. That, coincidentally, is another connection to the movie Rope, which makes no mention of homosexuality, but is often talked about now as a movie that discusses the subject, which was certainly taboo at the time.
What exactly happened to Marilyn Monroe’s Nell Forbes? What demons are in her past? What exactly is the nature of her relationship with her uncle (played quite well by talented actor Elisha Cook Jr., who interestingly had no children, but did spend some time raising a niece)? What will happen next to Nell? These questions are basically unanswered, leaving much to the imagination of the viewer, serving as sort of a psychological analysis of the viewer, and an exercise in dissecting dialogue and hunting for subtext.
Despite all the unanswered questions, one thing is clear however, Marilyn Monroe could definitely act.
March 3, 2010 at 1:04 pm
Glad to read this take on a genuinely creepy movie. It’s interesting to think of how the Studio System changed so much in the 1950s. I mean, could you imagine (ten years earlier) Zanuck making a similar vehicle for his 1940s blonde moneymaker, Betty Grable??
March 5, 2010 at 6:49 pm
It certainly seems to be a film that pushed the boundaries of the time.
Thanks for your comment and thanks for checking out the site. Expect more updates soon.
-Greg-
April 18, 2010 at 9:03 pm
Thank you so much for posting this! Don’t Bother To Knock is actually the first Marilyn Monroe film I ever saw (one of those wonderful Saturday afternoons when AMC was still AMC) and I was both terrified her and mesmerized by her. When people slag her off for not being ‘an actress,’ I always ruffle slightly at those words–the gal most *certainly* was.
June 15, 2010 at 8:20 am
Please come back!
June 18, 2010 at 2:18 pm
I can’t speak for Katie (haven’t had a lot of contact with her lately despite a few attempts), but I plan to add new content fairly soon.
-Greg-
August 30, 2010 at 9:58 pm
Just discovered this movie on netflix and gave it a go. Despite a weakness here and there, i found it a taut, claustrophobic and very satisfying thriller. a little early hitchcockian perhaps. Monroe’s performance was not always polished, but still excellent for a learning actress. I was particularly struck by how well it exploited the sad, vulnerable, victimized, lonely small town girl that she came to play after her bubbly years in niagra and the misfits. clearly she had a special talent for that kind of role. i read a contemporary bowsley crawther review that that proposed bette davis would have been better. hardly. monroe was great.
November 24, 2010 at 12:00 pm
It takes two to make a tense scene, Marlyn is great in this film but so is wydmark, who’s spiv like character (not entirely convincing as a pilot) bounces of Marlyns fragile mental state brilliantly.
Funny enough Anne Bancroft is one of my favourite actors, but her part is perhaps the most unintersting, the Lift attendant as the mannerisms of a brooden sychopath and his interplay with Monroe, is genuniely greepy. I didn’t know anything about this film before I watched it, most impressed.
March 2, 2012 at 4:50 pm
Roy Tait says:
Saw Don’t bother to knock last night on video for the first time. I wondered if the version had been cut in places for the video release which was
PG ( parental Guidance ). I think that the strengths of the film are in the acting . Marilin and Richard show great sexual attraction towards each other
and Richard displays the much harder act of sexual self control to make his character as believabe as Monroe’s Nell. A great film .
June 8, 2013 at 4:27 pm
Undeniably believe that which you stated. Your favorite reason seemed
to be on the net the simplest thing to be aware of. I say
to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think
about worries that they plainly don’t know about. You managed to hit the nail upon the top and defined out the whole thing without having side effect , people could take a signal. Will likely be back to get more. Thanks